Earlier today, How successful is Cancer treatment? was posted. At first, I thought about it and gave a little anecdote of my own in the comment about the success of treatments and what factors may play a role. However, does anyone see a question like this as extremely broad and nonconstructive?
Cancer treatment plans have a huge range of successes, failures, and operations. Every cat is different, and every cancer is different. Not only that, I think the question was meant to apply for other animals and not just cats. Now, I know the question was asking "how" successful, implying some sort of statistic or percentage, but labelling a percentage on the range of cancers across different breeds, sizes, animals, etc... just seems a bit too loose.
Should we allow questions like these on the site? For future owners at a loss, not knowing what treatment option to do, can a post like this really help if the range of answers is so broad? I've flagged the question as too broad but I'd like to hear other opinions.