An answer I had to review had a lot of text that was unsubstantiated and inferred it referred to two articles.
One article link didn't go to anything, and the other one implied the user should search for the link.
My initial reaction was to flag for LQP and leave a comment that we needed some statements to be substantiated, but apparently that facility isn't here anymore.
So... what are the options for this? Are we just down-voting and leaving a drive-by comment like I did (a.k.a. leaving it "as is"), or are we flagging as LQP, or are we creating a new "facts need to be backed up" sort of flag?