Timeline for Moderator Pro Tem Announcement
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:59 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://pets.stackexchange.com/ with https://pets.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 9, 2016 at 8:25 | comment | added | user105 | @John Our ideal scenario is having moderators that the community elects, versus those that we appoint based on likely merit. Pro-tem mods see the site through until it graduates, and then we have an election. It's very common for the pro-tem mods to run in the first election and win. We can't have an election early on, because the size of the community is just too small to sustain one. | |
| Jul 9, 2016 at 1:30 | comment | added | John Militer | Why exactly is it that pro tem moderators are only temporarily moderators and can't remain moderators after the elections if they've been active? | |
| Nov 30, 2013 at 0:00 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
|
|
| Nov 13, 2013 at 13:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPets/status/400609692004941824 | ||
| Oct 25, 2013 at 17:27 | comment | added | Beofett | Congratulations to our new mods! Thanks for being willing to put in the time and effort to help keep this site on track :) | |
| Oct 25, 2013 at 16:11 | comment | added | JoshDM | @Baarn - spell it "tackle" and not "takle" and I will. :) | |
| Oct 25, 2013 at 15:30 | comment | added | Baarn Mod | @JoshDM he, stop stalking me :D | |
| Oct 25, 2013 at 15:27 | comment | added | user34 | @Baarn Okay and Congratulations!!!!!! | |
| Oct 25, 2013 at 14:37 | comment | added | Joanne C Mod | Thanks all, I hope we can all live up to your expectations. Please remember, as well, that our chat room is a great way to reach out to us if you need assistance on the site and all of us hang out there from time to time anyways. | |
| Oct 25, 2013 at 14:12 | comment | added | Ankit Sharma | @JoshDM nice analysis. | |
| Oct 25, 2013 at 14:05 | comment | added | JoshDM | @PreciousTijesunimi - if you're curious to observe factors that would IMHO make a good "evaluation-selected" moderator, go look at Baarn's activity log on his meta and main accounts for this site. His responses / comments are thorough, even-tempered, and show core experience with the system. His participation is consistent, but not obsessive. The only drawback I can find are occasional minor issues with grammar and spelling, but that's understandable and can be corrected. And from a network standpoint, he's well distributed across several sites and has been around for at least 2 years. | |
| Oct 25, 2013 at 13:02 | comment | added | Monica Cellio | Yay! Excellent choices. Congrats! | |
| Oct 25, 2013 at 9:56 | comment | added | Baarn Mod | @PreciousTijesunimi the Community Managers have asked us (and probably others) directly by email if we would like to volunteer. In the meta discussion you linked to, Ashley Nunn and John Cavan actually did volunteer (highest voted answers). While I considered nominating myself I didn't as I have no previous experience as a moderator on the StackExchange network. As mentioned before the results of that discussion on meta are not binding to the Community Managers and they ultimately decide who they see fit as pro tempore mods, based on several factors I can only speculate about. | |
| Oct 25, 2013 at 9:56 | answer | added | Ankit Sharma | timeline score: 13 | |
| Oct 25, 2013 at 8:00 | comment | added | user194 | Congratulations to the new mods! | |
| Oct 25, 2013 at 7:19 | comment | added | user34 | Sorry to disturb but I thought you said volunteered their time. I didn't see 1 of them volunteering in Who do we want as moderators?. or does volunteering have another meaning. | |
| Oct 25, 2013 at 5:16 | history | asked | user105 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |