Timeline for Are questions about pet loss (death, grieving) on topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 17, 2020 at 9:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Oct 16, 2013 at 21:09 | comment | added | Andrew | @jmort253 it's my question, so don't be afraid to propose an edit. It's on hold anyways, and I don't plan to change it. | |
Oct 16, 2013 at 16:49 | comment | added | user87 | You have talked me into it :) | |
Oct 16, 2013 at 5:48 | comment | added | jmort253 | @Skippy - In short, I'd love to see that question reopened, but I think we can use the "on hold" feature for what it was really meant for -- a tool for editing and improving a post so that it becomes a shining, stellar example of expert Q&A. I was thinking of editing it myself, but I wanted to give the asker a crack at it first since my edits might be construed as a massive change to the post. Hope this helps! :) | |
Oct 16, 2013 at 5:44 | comment | added | jmort253 | @Skippy - What I'm saying is it should be on topic, but it shouldn't be broad. There's two separate issues here. Basically, it would be best to see people like you, with tons of experience with animals, writing an answer about loss and grief to a very tough question where only someone who has really truly experienced it can answer, versus having a question where just anyone can drop by and write some vague coping technique as an answer that doesn't address a real case of loss where there are real emotions involved. I'm a bit wordy this evening, so I hope this helps clarify. | |
Oct 16, 2013 at 5:40 | comment | added | user87 | Your answer is a little too oblique to vote on, you are saying owner grief and loss are on topic (by agreeing with the Q) but then specifying a different on topic topic, I'd suggest by rewording, I don't think these should be ontopic, except regarding to issues surrounding; bla bla bla what do you think? | |
Oct 16, 2013 at 5:27 | history | answered | jmort253 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |