Timeline for Questions of moral, ethical and legal nature
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:59 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://pets.stackexchange.com/ with https://pets.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Oct 11, 2013 at 13:08 | answer | added | Monica Cellio | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 11:08 | comment | added | user87 | @JohnCavan exactly! that's why I'm airing it.. I don't want to put people off, but we also need to decide as a community how we manage this.. will we lose prospective users or do we have system in place to handle it, so all perspectives are aired? | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 11:01 | comment | added | Joanne C | I'm ethically against it myself, but my problem with the question is that, for the most part, it's really an opinion ask. It may be a good one to ask, in this case, to establish a bit of a community personality with respect to treatment of our companions but ethics and morality questions are intrinsically opinions framed by the current culture of the person responding. | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 10:55 | comment | added | user87 |
@JohnCavan good point. The tile is When is declawing considered an ethical option, if at all?. You cannot open the ethical debate any more overtly really??
|
|
| Oct 11, 2013 at 10:46 | comment | added | Joanne C | I suspect that the down vote is to express disagreement that the answer really answers the question. It is kind of less and answer and more a positional statement by an organization and to point out it being illegal in some places. You can infer morality from that, I suppose, but it kind of dances around the question a bit. | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 8:50 | answer | added | psubsee2003 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 4:55 | answer | added | user53 | timeline score: 6 | |
| Oct 11, 2013 at 4:18 | history | asked | user87 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |